Must go to 1968-1970. Going back more than 35 years, we have to recover the memories of that time from the memories that have everything imprinted. None of the researcher's business. I don't even have old magazines to check if that's the case. Who took what they had secured and… well, thought it was a good thing, and forgot to give it back? It flourished for almost ten years with the magazine 'Elahuthu'. It was a refreshing magazine that showed new paths. A magazine that grew up struggling with taunts, protests, lashings and above all poverty. It is a magazine that nurtures its discoverers. It is impossible to say what many of us would have grown into if 'writing' had not appeared. Names heard after 70, "We will be the pioneers of Bichhamurthy" were to crown themselves many years later. Many such people re-forecast their horoscopes themselves. On that day there was only protest, condemnation and lack of support. Today, after 80, they find that there was also parochial elitism in it. 'Writing' is what gives us and these people a platform to raise their voice and a guide to set up.
Before that, no one had ever heard the voices heard through 'Writing' and the platforms that followed, pointing out new paths; never seen Literary magazine, new poetry, criticism, these three traditions, gave to today's Tamil 'writing'. It is a gift. This is what I have said before. But today it has to be said again. Saying this much, acknowledging it and then citing it is the method and justification. Transgressing Telegram Number Data the 'script' is not rejection. So, writingAfter Vodu grew up, for a period, some of us were dissatisfied with the demarcation of the written press. None of us were free to express our opinions in writing. I have censured and criticized the writings of those whom Chellappa respected and were very close to. Chellappa himself said that 'Saminathan has seen me'. But Chellappa's interests were within the circle of literature. If you go more, you can see a little about the drama. But I had a lot of things to write, say and exchange ideas beyond these boundaries.
I know that Satchidananda's involvements and concerns are wide-ranging. Same with Darumu Sivaramu. However, in my very first article, Although Chellappa did not forbid me to transgress these boundaries, he was not inclined to give too much space to literary transgressions. A small magazine, with so much to do within the confines of literature, he doesn't like to “spread out,” in his words. Despite this, Shivaram and I only managed to write one or two. I remember writing about Yugoslavia graphics. vslS. I happened to be in Chennai when Ponnuthurai came to Chennai from Batticaloa. In Chellappa's house, I was also discussing Ponnuthurai in his presence. Two things: one is the Tamil struggle in Sri Lanka; The other was a table fan running on the side. Whether it is art or craft is a debate among us. Among us the first form of art. Then it was made in millions I said craft. S. B. I don't remember what he said. At one point Chellappa said, “Enough, you two have spoken. Now let's talk about literature a little,” he scolded. Why I came to tell you, Chellappa will be patient for anything.